Data platform lead
Owns the warehouse and its SLAs, and just watched a trivial query take thirty seconds.
Most of that wait is a serverless warehouse spinning up, not the query running. A compute engine with nothing to warm holds interactive answers under two seconds.
On a serverless warehouse, a simple agent question against a few thousand rows can take about thirty seconds, because most of the wait is the warehouse starting up rather than the query running.
Owns the warehouse and its SLAs, and just watched a trivial query take thirty seconds.
Owns the agent connection, and cannot explain the lag to business users.
Owns the agent rollout, and watches every question pay a startup tax.
A team connects an analytics agent to a small serverless warehouse and asks routine questions against a gold layer of a few thousand rows. Answers land in roughly thirty seconds, and the community reading is that this timing is typical, because the delay is cold start from the serverless spin-up rather than the complexity of the query.
The usual responses are workarounds. Build Metric Views, add query caching, run a separate workbench. None of them remove the startup itself, so the first question of the day, or the first after an idle gap, keeps paying the tax.
most of the thirty seconds is the warehouse starting, not the scan
a few thousand rows wait as long as a large table
the first query after a pause pays the startup cost again
caching, Metric Views, and a workbench sit on top without removing the spin-up
interactive sessions open with a thirty-second pause
engineers keep warehouses alive on a timer to hide the delay
business users stop trusting a tool that stalls on simple questions
an agent that feels slow does not move past pilot
the platform team explains the same lag every week
a thirty-second wait reads as broken, whatever the cause
Swap in a pilot of e6data's query engine alongside the existing serverless warehouse to:
queries run on an engine with no warehouse to spin up, so the first question is as fast as the hundredth. The open tables and the Agent interface stay as they are. What changes is that startup stops being a line in every answer.
the engine keeps p95 under two seconds on interactive queries, including joins and aggregations. The dashboards and agents stay pointed at the same data. What gets returned is a steady response time instead of a cold-versus-warm swing.
Iceberg, Delta, and Hudi tables stay under the existing catalog, access controls carry over, and adoption is an endpoint change rather than a migration, needing only fast validation of the required integration mapping. What is added is a faster path for the queries that need it.
The result is interactive analytics that answer in seconds from the first question, on the tables already in place. Setup and connection details are in the query engine documentation.
Reach out to book a demo, share challenges you’re facing, and tell us how this fits into what you’re currently working on or thinking about.
Problems we’re solvingAn actual person replies, usually within one working day.