AI engineering lead
Owns the agent rollout, and needs a concurrency number to plan it.
The queries-per-minute and concurrency limits for a single agent are undocumented. An engine with a known concurrency profile answers the question before the rollout.
The queries-per-minute and concurrency limits for a single analytics agent are not documented, so teams planning a rollout to a thousand or more users cannot tell whether one agent will hold.
Owns the agent rollout, and needs a concurrency number to plan it.
Owns the warehouse the agent runs on and the SLA behind it.
Owns the promise of agent analytics to the whole user base.
A team is ready to put an agent in front of a large user base and needs to know how many concurrent users one agent can support. The public answer is thin. The questions-per-minute limits, the concurrency ceiling, and the throughput are not documented, and threads on the topic collect follow-along replies rather than numbers. And the surface keeps widening. The same agent is now reachable from inside Excel and Google Sheets, so the user base is no longer the analysts who opted in, it is everyone who already has a spreadsheet open.
Without those limits, capacity planning becomes a guess. The rollout either over-provisions to be safe or ships and hopes the agent holds at peak.
queries-per-minute and concurrency ceilings are undocumented
capacity for a thousand users cannot be sized from the data available
the agent may hold in a pilot and fail at full traffic
many users route through a single agent with unknown throughput
capacity is set without a concurrency number to plan against
teams build their own tests to find the ceiling
the launch waits on limits no one can confirm
an agent that stalls at peak lands in front of the whole user base
the owner ships without knowing the ceiling
the same concurrency question gets asked and never resolved
The ceiling on an Agent rollout sits in a layer you can't inspect or resize. The alternative is to run the agent path on compute with documented, load-tested limits, so sizing for a thousand users is arithmetic instead of a support ticket.
one user question turns into several machine-generated queries: schema checks, candidate SQL, retries after errors. e6data's engine sustains 1,000+ QPS at p95 under two seconds, so you can plan for that amplification before launch rather than discovering it at peak.
compute follows concurrent load up and down. A pilot that holds at 50 users holds the same way at 1,000 because the profile grows without changing shape.
your table formats, catalog, and access controls stay where they are. The agent's queries move onto compute you can size, observe, and load-test yourself before launch.
The result is a concurrency number the rollout can be planned on, instead of a limit no one can confirm. Setup and connection details are in the query engine documentation.
Reach out to book a demo, share challenges you’re facing, and tell us how this fits into what you’re currently working on or thinking about.
Problems we’re solvingAn actual person replies, usually within one working day.